It
was said that ability of the mind to re-evaluate existing convictions upon
acquiring new information is the sign of intellect. In other words a
human being has to always strive to doubt existing authoritative opinions, push
the envelope, and get outside the box to be on the winning team of progress.
Unfortunately,
the physical implication of this approach is not always cut and dry and often
people, accustomed to the black and white mindset, instead of going out of the
box attempt to break it.
In
one of the online discussion I came across an opinion that doubted the good old
scientifically and clinically proven fact, that massage increases arterial
blood flow supply to the tissue. Having raised an objection to defend the view
that I go by in my daily practice, I offered a scientific explanation on
why the studies supporting the idea that “massage therapy disturbing
blood supply” are incompetent and why using such study as a reference is
invalid.
Oh
boy, I was accused of being retrograde, was drowned with buzz words and pepper
sprayed with rhapsody of "out of the box" thinking.
This
incident brought to mind a recent case of a patient with severe pain in the
left side of lower back. The patient was a young female, who
experienced severe pain at the left side lower back in sitting position or
while standing up.
She
was referred to our clinic by a physician who was Board Certified in Physical
Medicine, and who had been invited to consult the patient when she was
hospitalized. Her physician informed me that all necessary tests, including CT
and MRI, had found no significant spinal abnormalities.
Yet
she endured quite an Odyssey of pain. She couldn't work and her day-today
life was greatly affected. The patient became depressed, anxious, and
mentally exhausted.
In
a desperate attempt to help, her primary care physician referred her to the
Multidiscipline Pain Management Center in hope of addressing her condition with
a combination of acupuncture, chiropractic adjustments and physical therapy.
This approach failed and her pain and disability increased. The pain became so
intolerable that she was hospitalized.
After
an intense flair up her pain management physician recommended surgery of
electrodes insertion in the spinal cord to prevent pain stimuli reaching the
brain. However, the Pain Management center's psychiatrist insisted that such
treatment should be postponed and antipsychotic medications, as well as
psychotherapy, should be attempted first.
Patient
was practically disabled for four months prior to her visit to our clinic.
These
symptoms could have been the result of many different abnormalities,
including spinal disorders, muscular syndromes, and abdominal disorders
accompanied by adhesions. By having lower back MRI Drs.
excluded spinal disorders and various blood tests excluded significant inner
organ disorders that could produce this type of symptoms.
Thinking
over her case, because of absence of trigger point in lower back region, I
suspected that her problem lies in the abdomen area and decided to start with
abdominal massage in order to accelerate venous blood and lymph drainage. These
techniques are gentle and always feel pleasant. After a few minutes of applying
the drainage techniques she began to cry. My first thought was that my therapy
had increased intensity of pain. As I asked her about it, she replied,
"No, it didn't increase my pain." At this moment, it was obvious to
me that she had released psychological tension and suppressed emotions. This is
very common in patients who suffer from intense chronic pain, and such a
reaction ignited hope for a successful rehabilitation.
After
application of abdominal drainage techniques she reported a significant
decrease of pain intensity in lower back region. I asked her to sit up. Since
for many months, prior to this treatment, she couldn't sit for 10 minutes experiencing
excruciating pain, it was to our great surprise, the pain didn't come back as
she sat still for more than 10 minutes. At this moment, my suspicion that her
severe back pain was the result of significant venous stasis and lymphedema in
the abdominal cavity grew into assurance. Acceleration of venous
blood drainage means increase of arterial blood supply. If, God
forbid, massage therapy disturbs blood supply, we would make people sick.
In
the last 20 years evidence-based medicine was “redirected“ to draw its
conclusions from research papers exclusively, disregarding clinical outcome as
evidence-based proof. Therefore, ignoring critical evidence, my opponents
supported the conclusion that ”massage therapy disturbs blood supply.”
Incidentally,
this approach of evidence based medicine recently was denied by FDA. Today, in
order for product to be approved, not only research paper is needed, but also
patients reported outcome should be positive. Massage therapy is about results
or clinical outcome. Any methodology, being it oriental massage therapy or
conventional scientifically developed methods, has to be clinically tested as
safe and effective. The essence of abdominal massage is to replace large
amounts of venous blood in the abdomen area with the fresh arterial blood rich
with nutrients and oxygen, thus letting the body to heal
itself. Considering that 30 to 35% of all blood supply is
delivered to abdominal cavity, it's hard to imagine that massage
somehow doesn't increase the flow of arterial blood. In other words
if it weren't for massage than what did it?
When
trying to get out of the box, one should remember that this is a considerable
mental and spiritual effort, which cannot be undertaken by
bluntly undermining everything that was done by the previous generations
of exceptional human minds, who, perhaps, also stepped out of their boxes
in attaining this knowledge.
To review the full protocol for abdominal/visceral massage please
click here.
Please click this
link to get familiar with the scientific review of the studies that
concluded that ”massage therapy disturbs blood supply”